Index
Previous Next


3. Description of polyproline helices

3.1 Comparison of helix geometry

In Fig. 3.1. the picture of deca-glycine in PPII and PPI conformation is presented, without hydrogen atoms. From this, it can be clearly seen, that the more symmetrical PPII is a left-handed helix, with a higher rise, thus smaller diameter, than the right-handed PPI helix.

PPII and PPI helicesFig. 3.1.. Deca-glycine in PPII and PPI without hydrogen atoms, spacefill modells, CPK colouring

For comparison, here is a table of theoretical helical parameters of the PPII-, PPI-, and alpha-helix.

Type of helix

Phi

Psi

Omega

n

r

p

H-bond
PPII

-75

145

180

-3.0

3.1

9.3

-

PPI

-75

160

0

+3.3

1.7

5.6

-

alpha

-57.8

-47

180

+3.6

1.5

5.5

i,i+4

n is the number of residues per helical turn, positive value means right-handed, negative means left-handed helix;
r is the helical rise per residue (Å), and p is the helical pitch (Å/turn).

You can find the similar parameters and picture of other secondary structure types in Section 8 of PPS97.

As none of the poly-proline helices has an intra-chain H-bond, these secondary structure elements can not be identified by hydrogen-bond pattern characteristics, as regularly done for other types of secondary structure, but only by torsion angles. This may be one reason for having been assigned to the 'unordered' or 'random' group earlier.

3.2 Polyproline type I (PPI) helices

poly-L-proline in PPI conformationFig. 3.2. Poly-L-proline in PPI conformation (PDB)

The formation of the right-handed PPI helix is possible only with proline residues because of the required cis conformation. There were no PPI helical segments identified (yet?) in proteins, but poly-L-proline in apolar solvents (alcohols with long carbon-chain) was found to adopt this conformation in some circumstances.

3.3 Polyproline type II (PPII) helices

poly-L-proline in PPII conformationFig. 3.3.1. Poly-L-proline in PPII conformation (PDB)

The PPII helix has much more biological importance.

It has been found in a large number of proteins, with little deviation from the theoretical helix. The most important factor for distortion of helices, is the possible cis conformation of proline. The length of PPII segments is shorter (4-8 residues) than alpha-helical or beta-sheet segments, which may be due to the lack of the stabilizing effect of intra-molecular hydrogen-bonds. For the same reason PPII helices are more flexible than alpha-helices. PPII helices has a rise per residue almost twice as great as alpha-helices, so are much longer with the same number of residues, and the main chain of PPII is more accessible. PPII helices were found to be more exposed to solvent, than other secondary structures, except beta-turns. PPII helices seem to be stabilized by main chain-water hydrogen bonds (in the absence of main chain- main chain H-bonds), and tend to have a regular pattern of hydrogen bonds with water. After this, it is not surprising , that PPII helices are found mostly on the protein surface, and has a preference, to hydrophilic residues (and proline). Pro is the most preferred amino acid (and PPII is the most preferred structure for Pro, so Pro residues can stabilize the structure), but any amino acid can be found in a PPII helix, and helices were found without any proline. Besides Pro, most often Gln, Ser, Arg and Ala are found in PPII regions, Gly is rare.
The geometry of PPII helix allows this conformation to directly lead to, or directly start from other secondary structures, and PPII helix can serve as a bridge between different secondary structures. The PPII helix followed by a beta-turn has been described as a novel superseconadry structure, and has been suggested to to be the conformational requirement for proline hydroxilation in nascent procollagen.

PPII symmetry
Fig. 3.2.2. Poly-L-proline in PPII conformation, viewed parallel to the helix axis, presented as sticks, without H-atoms. (PDB)
It can be seen, that the PPII helix has a 3-fold symmetry, and every 4th residue is in the same position (at a distance of 9.3 Å from each other). This is important in when binding of PPII helices to SH3 domains.

Next: PPII helices in proteins


by Zoltan Szabo , 1997