The literature is in general agreement that the two types of interaction that are most prevalent in proteins are (i) hydrophobic interactions and (ii) hydrogen bonds. The reaction of these bonds upon going from the unfolded to the folded state is summarized in the cartoon below.
Although both these interactions have small free energies per residue,
they are important because there are so many of them. The same is true for
those interactions which stabilize the unfolded state. The most important
of which is conformational entropy. Thus,
the overall free energy of a folded protein is given by the small difference
between two large numbers. This is a major reason for the difficulty of
quantitative computational calculation of protein stability. In a recent
analysis of the factors contributing to the stability of RNase T1, the stabilizing
and destabilizing interactions were estimated at 271 and 286 kcal/mol, respectively
(Pace et al., 1996).
Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were estimated to contribute
260 kcal/mol to the stabilizing interactions, while the bulk of the destabilizing
factors were attributed to loss of conformational entropy on folding, and
unfavourable burial of peptide and polar groups. See table.
Destabilising | Free Energy (kcal/mol) |
Conformational Entropy | -177 |
Peptide Groups Buried | -81 |
Polar Groups Buried | -28 |
Total Destabilising | -286 |
Stabilising | |
Histidine Ionisation | +4 |
Disulphide Bonds | +7 |
Hydrophobic Groups Buried | +94 |
Hydrogen Bonding | +166 |
Total Stabilising | +271 |
----------------------------------------------------------- | |
G (estimate) | -15 |
G (measured) | +9 |
The Unfolded State The Hydrophobic EffectBeginning